Focused invoice review
An invoice-looking letter can describe a directory listing, advertising placement, or renewal your business may not remember ordering. FilingGuard organizes what the notice says, who wants payment, and what to compare with your own records before you decide how to respond.
Independent document review. FilingGuard does not prove fraud, authenticate the vendor, determine contract liability, or decide that no payment is owed.
Why this is confusing
Invoice formatting can make a listing, advertising offer, or renewal request look like a routine account payable item even when authorization is unclear.
An invoice appearance does not establish that an order was authorized. Compare the claimed service with purchase orders, contracts, emails, vendor records, and prior invoices before deciding what to do.
Authorization matters
Compare the claimed prior order or renewal, service description, listing or advertising terms, amount, response deadline, payment address or website, and small-print offer or solicitation language with your own purchase orders, contracts, emails, vendor records, and prior invoices.
Notice language
Your records
FilingGuard Detailed Review
Official comparison
As of July 20, 2026, FTC small-business guidance describes fake-invoice and online directory-listing schemes and recommends clear purchase-approval procedures and close invoice review.
General FTC guidance does not establish whether this particular sender, invoice, or claimed transaction is fraudulent or legally enforceable.
Official information last checked July 20, 2026.
Review scope
The existing generic FilingGuard Detailed Review organizes visible notice details, warning signals, uncertainty, and practical verification steps. It does not add a directory-specific questionnaire, extractor, classifier, or report.
Important boundaries
Four steps
Upload a clear image or limited-beta PDF.
Enter optional details such as sender, amount, deadline, and notice type.
Complete the existing secure $29 checkout.
Receive the existing generic FilingGuard review.
Protect sensitive data
Redact unrelated sensitive information while keeping the invoice details needed for a useful document review visible.
Common questions
No. Some directory, listing, or advertising invoices may relate to services a business authorized. Treat the invoice as a record to compare with your purchasing history rather than assuming what it proves.
Compare the sender, payee, claimed service, amount, deadline, payment path, and disclosures with purchase orders, contracts, emails, approved-vendor records, and prior invoices you already have.
Look for the original authorization, the person who approved it, the service period, renewal terms, earlier invoices, and evidence that the described listing or advertising was actually requested.
No. FilingGuard can organize visible wording and suggest records to compare, but it does not determine whether a contract exists or whether payment is legally owed.
No. FilingGuard does not authenticate vendors or perform a live vendor lookup. It reviews the visible document and identifies uncertainty and verification steps.
The existing generic FilingGuard Detailed Review organizes visible sender, heading, amount, deadline, payment path, wording, disclosures, urgency, warning signals, uncertainty, and suggested verification steps.
Yes, on a limited-beta basis. You may upload PNG, JPG/JPEG, WEBP, or limited-beta PDF, up to 10 MB. Clear images generally work best, and an unreadable PDF may require more customer-entered details.
Redact unrelated bank or card details, signatures, employee information, credentials, tax identifiers, and customer information. Preserve the sender, payee, amount, deadline, payment path, claimed service, disclosures, and relevant reference numbers.
Primary material
Official information last checked July 20, 2026.
Keep comparing
Review before responding
Independent document review. FilingGuard does not prove fraud, authenticate the vendor, determine contract liability, or decide that no payment is owed.
